(manku.gs@gmail.com)
According to G N Lewis (1923):
BF3 + NH3 → H3N+–BF3 –
Lewis acid + Lewis base → Coordinated adduct
Lewis acids are defined as those compounds or ions, which cannot be classified as acids on the basis of Arrhenius or Brönsted definition, but can accept a pair of electrons from other molecules or ions. Thus, the following species are Lewis acids:
Ag+ + 2CN– → [Ag(CN)2] –
Ni2+ + 4NH3 → [Ni(NH3)4]2+
Fe3+ + 6CNS– → [Fe(CNS)6]3 –
Al3+ + 4OH– → [Al(OH)4] –
Co3+ + 6NH3 → [Co(NH3)6]3+
BF3 + NH3 → [H3N+–BF3 –]
AlCl3 + Cl – → [AlCl4] –
SnCl4 + 2Cl – → [SnCl6]2 –
PCl5 + Cl – → [PCl6] –
AsF5 + F – → [AsF6] –
SbF5 + Cl – → [SbClF5] –
IF5 + F – → [IF6] –
4. Multiple bonded covalent compounds SO2, SO3, CO or CO2, which can form a covalent bond with anions like halide, hydroxide or other Lewis bases:
SO2 + OH – → [SO2(OH)] –
SO3 + F – → [SO3F] –
CO2 + OH – → [CO2(OH)] –
CO + Cl2 → COCl2
Lewis bases are defined as those compounds or ions, which cannot be classified as a base on the basis of Arrhenius or Brönsted definition, but contain lone pair(s) of electrons that can be donated to Lewis acids, and form a coordinate or covalent bond.
Due to the presence of lone pairs of electrons, almost all the Lewis bases are Brönsted bases.
Lewis bases can be classified as follows:
The definition proposed by Lux (1939) and extended by Flood (1947) considers the acid–base reaction on the basis transfer of oxide ions. Acid is a substance that can accept oxide ions (O2–) whereas bases are the oxide ion donors.
Thus the reactions
CaO + SiO2 → CaSiO3
ZnO + SO3 → ZnSO4
involve basic oxides (CaO, ZnO) and acidic oxides (SiO2, SO3) to form salts (CaSiO3, ZnSO4).
The acids need not always be oxides as can be seen in the interaction of pyrosulphates with oxides of titanium, niobium or tantalum at 1100 K:
TiO2 + Na2S2O7 → TiOSO4 + Na2SO4
Base Acid Salts
Substances are called amphoteric if they tend to both lose and gain oxide ions:
ZnO ⇌ Zn2+ + O2– (Base) ; ZnO + O2– ⇌ ZnO22- (Acid)
Al2O3 ⇌ Al3+ + 3O2– (Base) ; Al2O3 + O2– ⇌ 2AlO2– (Acid)
The Lux−Flood definition can be extended to include any anion transfer like halide or sulphide. It is applicable to systems where no solvents involved like molten melts or non-protonic solvents.
Usanovich removed the condition that bases should donate a pair of electrons as such and extended the Lewis definition by proposing that any number of electrons can be transferred in an acid−base reaction. According to Usanovich’s definition, acid is a chemical species that can accept one or more electrons (not necessarily electron pairs), whereas base is the chemical species that can donate or release any number of electrons.
Therefore, in addition to Arrhenius, Brönsted and Lewis acids, the Usanovich’s acids include all the oxidizing agents (electron acceptors), whereas bases include all the reducing agent (electron donors). When a species accepts electrons, it is said to undergo reduction, and acts as an oxidizing agent. Thus, in reactions
Ag+ + e– ⇌ Ag
S + 2e– ⇌ S 2 –
Fe3+ + 3e – ⇌ Fe2+
In these examples, silver ions, sulphur and iron(III) ions are accepting electrons and are getting reduced. However, according to Usanovich definition, these reactions show the acidic behavior of these ions.
Similarly, when a species loses electrons, it undergoes oxidation and acts as a reducing agent. Thus, hydrogen and metals are reducing agents – they lose electrons and undergo oxidation:
H2 ⇌ 2H+ + 2e–
Na ⇌ Na+ + e –
Mg ⇌ Mg2+ + 2e –
But Usanovich considers such species as bases as they lose electrons in the reactions and are electron donors.
However, in some cases, there is not much difference between the Usanovich definition and the Lewis definition. For example, the reaction between pyridine and oxygen to form pyridine-N-oxide is an oxidation reaction of pyridine as well as the adduct formation in which pyridine nitrogen atom donates an electron pair to oxygen atom:
2C5H5N + O2 → [C5H5N→O] or [C5H5N+–O–[C5H5N→O]
Cadey – Elsey definition of acids and bases is based upon the auto-ionization of solvents. In liquid state, all the ionizing solvents undergo auto-ionization, i.e., dissociate into their ions:
Solvent (l) ⇌ Cation (Acid) + Anion (Base)
2H2O ⇌ H3O+ + OH –
2NH3(l) ⇌ NH4+ + NH2 –
2SO2(l) ⇌ SO2+ + SO3 2 –
CH3CO2H(l) ⇌ CH3CO2H2+ + CH3CO2 –
In an ionizing solvent like water, liquid ammonia, liquid sulphur dioxide or acetic acid, acids are defined as those species that increase the concentration of the cation of the solvent , whereas bases are defined as those species that increase the concentration of the anion of the solvent. Thus, in water as solvent or in aqueous solutions, all the species that increase the concentration of hydronium ions (H3O+) are acids, whereas the species that increase the concentration of hydroxide ions (OH –) are bases.
However, in liquid ammonia as the solvent, the acids are compounds like ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) and ammonium acetate (CH3COONH4) which ionize to form ammonium ions and increase the concentration of the cation of the solvent:
NH4Cl ⇌ NH4+ + Cl–
NH4NO3 ⇌ NH4+ + NO3–
CH3COONH4 ⇌ NH4+ + CH3COO –
Similarly, in liquid ammonia as solvent, bases are compounds like sodamide (NaNH2) or potassium amide (KNH2), which ionize to form NH2–, the amide anion:
NaNH2 ⇌ Na+ + NH2–
The advantage of such a definition is that all the ionizing systems AB can be treated analogously. The ionic product of the solvent can be defined as KAB
KAB = [A+][B –]
And, a pA scale, analogous to the pH scale, can be set for each solvent where the neutral point when [A+] = [B –] will be given by –(1/2)KAB,
Limitations: The limitations of the solvent system definition are the following.