(G S. Manku, email: manku.gs@gmail.com)
After Boyle’s theory of atoms (1677) as small sized particles of different shapes, and Dalton’s laws of chemical combination (1808), attempts were made by scientists to arrange or form groups of known elements having similar properties.
In 1868–1870, Demitri Mendeleev published a series of tables of elements, in which the elements were arranged according to their increasing atomic weights (or, atomic masses. A modern version of the Mendeleev’s periodic table is given as Table 4.1.1. It has the following salient features.
Groups: The elements are arranged in nine vertical columns, called groups, which were numbered as I, II, III, …, VIII, and 0 (zero). Except for group VIII and group zero, each group was subdivided into two sub-groups, A and B. The elements of a particular subgroup show similar properties with a regular gradation from top to bottom.
Periods: The horizontal rows of the table are called periods. In a period, the properties of the elements show a regular change. (See below for details.)
Place for unknown elements: To assign a suitable groups to an element, in which all the members have similar properties, vacant spaces were left to accommodate the yet undiscovered elements.
Change of atomic masses (atomic weights): In some cases, to fix it in a suitable place, the valency of the element was changed arbitrarily without any fresh chemical evidence. The following example will make this clear.
In 1870, aluminium was considered divalent metal and its oxide was assigned the formula AlO. The Al:O mass ration in the oxide is 9:8 (54:48). Therefore, the equivalent weight of aluminium was taken as 9, being the mass of aluminium, in grams, combining with 8 grams of oxygen. Therefore, accepted atomic weight of aluminium was considered as 2 × 9 = 18, which was between the atomic masses of two highly electronegative elements, oxygen (atomic mass = 16) and fluorine (atomic mass = 19). To assign a better place for aluminium, Mendeleev changed its valency to 3, which made its atomic mass = 3 × 9 = 27, and placed it conveniently between electropositive magnesium (24) and silicon (28) in the periodic table.
However, many elements like cerium, thorium or uranium remained placed incorrectly in the table because of (1) erroneous results accepted and (2) between hydrogen and uranium, as many as 26 elements were yet undiscovered at that time.
Table (4.1).1 A Modern Version of Mendeleev’s Table of Elements
* The 14 elements following lanthanum (La), called lanthanons or the lanthanide elements, are grouped together and placed along with lanthanum in sixth period of group III B.
** The 14 elements following actinium (Ac), called actinons or the actinide elements, are grouped together along with actinium, and placed in the seventh period of group III B.
The Mendeleev’s table of elements proved helpful in understanding the variations and gradation in the properties of different elements and their compounds.
1.Prediction of Properties: From the gaps present in the table, Mendeleev predicted properties of three undiscovered elements, heavier than but similar to boron, aluminium, and silicon. When scandium (Sc), gallium (Ga) and germanium (Ge) were discovered, their properties were remarkably predicted by him. This made Mendeleev’s periodic table became extremely popular for his remarkable insight and accuracy.
2. The group number of the element indicated the highest valence state attained by the element.
3. Gradation in Properties: In a subgroup, the elements and their compounds show a regular gradation in their physical and chemical properties (See later for details).
4. Diagonal Relationship: There are three pairs of elements belonging to different groups, which resemble each other very closely: (1) lithium (Li) – magnesium (Mg), (2) beryllium (Be) – aluminium (Al) and (3) boron (B) – silicon (Si). Each of these pairs has one element of group I, II and III of the second period and another element of third period placed diagonally to it in groups II, III and IV respectively. This change from highly electronegative halogens of group VII A to highly electropositive alkali metals of group I A indicated the existence of a group of elements, which should be neither electronegative nor electropositive. Discovery of noble gases in 1886, which had atomic masses between those of the halogens and alkali metals, gave considerable support to the Mendeleev’s table.
(4.1).2.3 Drawbacks of Mendeleev’s Periodic Table of Elements
The Mendeleev’s table has certain drawbacks, some of which are given below.
1. Length of a Period: There is no explanation for different number of elements in different periods. The extra-short first period has only two elements, short second and third periods have eight elements each, long fourth and fifth periods have eighteen elements each, and extra-long sixth and seventh periods} have 32 elements each.
2. Elements of A and B subgroups: Except for the formal similarity in the composition of the compounds of elements of A and B subgroups, there is almost no resemblance in their nature or In groups IV, V, VI and VII, the subgroup A contains electronegative elements, whereas the subgroup B contains metallic elements.
3. Group VIII has three subgroups, A, B and C, whereas group zero has only one subgroup. All other groups have two subgroups each. Why?
4. Only in group VIII, the members of subgroups A, B and C have three successive elements of the series. In all other cases, the successive elements are placed in two adjacent groups.
5. Stability of Different Valence States: It cannot be explained why for some elements, the higher states are stable, whereas for others, the lower states are more stable. Also, why should the valence state of elements of A subgroup changes by 2 units, whereas that for B subgroup elements changes by one unit?
6. Oxidation States: Though the group number indicates the highest oxidation state attained by the elements, in group VIII, only ruthenium and osmium show the octavalent state in teteroxide.
7. Group zero elements show oxidation states of II, IV, VI and VIII in fluorides, oxides and oxido anions, but no compound is formed in oxidation state of zero.
8. Zerovalent State: It is difficult to understand the concept of zero state in compounds, which exists in many metal carbonyls, nitrosyls and related organometallic compounds
9. Isotopes and Isobars: Isotopes of an element with different masses are clubbed together in one place, while isobars (same atomic masses, different elements) are assigned separate groups.
10. Reversal of Order of Elements: Simply for assigning proper groups to the elements, Mendeleev placed tellurium (atomic mass = 128) before iodine (atomic mass = 127); and cobalt (atomic mass = 59) before nickel (atomic mass = 58), without assigning any other reason.
11. Nature of the elements changes suddenly from highly electronegative halogens to highly electropositive alkali metals as atomic masses increase.
12. The Lanthanons and Actinons: In the sixth period, lanthanum (La, Z = 57) and the 14 elements following lanthanum with = 58 to 71), called lanthanons or lanthanides, are bunched together in one place in group B. Similarly, in seventh period, actinium (Ac, Z = 89) and the following 14 elements with Z = 90 to 103, called actinons or the actinides are bundled together and placed collectively in group III B.
13. Irregular changes in atomic masses: Finally, there is no regularity in the change in the atomic masses of the successive elements which may decrease by 1 unit (nickel and iodine) or increase by 1, 2, 3, 4 (argon, krypton, admium or xenon) or even 5 units (scandium, copper) for the successive elements. Therefore, there is no way of determining the number of elements between two known elements. The problem became serious in the studies of lanthanide elements – much effort was wasted in futile work in the field.
This shows that the classification of the elements on the basis of their atomic masses is not correct.
Moseley’s work on the characteristic X rays of elements showed that the atomic number Z, the number of protons in the nucleus of an atom, is a fundamental characteristic property of the elements. The number of electrons in the extranuclear part of an atom is also equal to Z. As properties of the elements and their compounds depend upon the arrangement of electrons in their extranuclear part, the properties of the elements strongly depend on their atomic number, Z.
Also, for all the successive elements, Z increases exactly by one unit.
According to the periodic law, the properties of elements are a periodic function of their atomic numbers.
In the long form of the periodic table (Table 4.2.1), also known as the Bohr–Bury periodic table, elements are arranged in the order of increasing atomic numbers. The elements are arranged in such a manner that the configuration of their incompletely filled (valence) orbitals is the same.
Table (4.1).2 The Bohr – Bury’s Long Form of the Periodic Table
Note: The d orbitals filled are of the (n = 1)th shell, whereas the f orbitals (4f and 5f series) belong to the (n = 2)th shell and are the members of sixth and seventh groups respectively.
The salient points of the Long form of Periodic table are the following.
This explains the different number of elements in a period as shown in Table (4.1).3.
Table (4.1).3 Number of Elements in different Periods of the Long Table
—————————————————————————————
Period Orbitals filled No, of Orbitals Total Electrons filled
—————————————————————————————-
First 1s 1 2
Second 2s, 2p 1 + 3 = 4 8
Third 3s, 3p 1 + 3 = 4 8
Fourth 4s, 3d, 4p 1 + 5 + 3 = 9 18
Fifth 5s, 4d, 5p 1 + 5 + 3 = 9 18
Sixth 6s, 4f, 5d, 6p 1 + 7 + 5 + 3 = 16 32
Seventh 7s, 5f, 6d, 7p 1 + 7 + 5 + 3 = 16 32
————————————————————————————-
The advantages of the long periodic table over Mendeleev’s table are the following.
Tendency of atoms to attain the stable noble gas shell by gain or loss of electrons in the valence shells makes the elements electronegative or electropositive.
(4.1).3.4 Limitation of the Long Form of Periodic Table
The long form of the periodic table is based upon the auf bau principle. Therefore, it incorporates all the limitations of the auf bau principle. Some of the limitations of the cumbersome and long periodic table are the following.