(G S Manku, email: manku.gs@gmail.com)
Based on the electronic configuration of the incompletely filled shells of electrons, the elements are classified as (1) Main period representative or R elements, (2) Transition or T elements, and (3) Inner-transition or IT elements.
In representative elements or the R families, only the outermost shell has incompletely filled orbitals. Thus, only the outermost n-th shell is the valence shell of R elements. These elements are further classified as:
Table (4.2).1 The R Elements
——————————————————————————————
Configuration Group number Family (Common) name
——————————————————————————————-
ns1 Group 1 R-1 Alkali metals ns2np1
ns2 Group 2 R-2 Alkaline earth metals
ns2np1 Group 13 R-3 Boron family
ns2np2 Group 14 R-4 Carbon family
ns2np3 Group 15 R-5 Nitrogen family
ns2np4 Group 16 R-6 Oxygen family
ns2np5 Group 17 R-7 The halogens
ns2np6 Group 18 R-0 Group 0, noble elements
————————————————————————————
Strictly speaking, in the atoms of copper and zinc families, ytterbium and nobelium also, only the outermost shell is incomplete, all other underlying subshells are completely filled up with electrons and should also be considered as representative elements:
————————————————————————————
Copper Z =29 [Ar] 3s23p63d10 4s1 Group 11
Transition element
Silver Z =47 [Kr] 4s24p64d10 5s1 Group 11
Transition element
Gold Z =79 [Xe] 4f14 5s25p65d10 6s1 Group 11
Transition element
Zinc Z =30 [Ar] 3s23p63d10 4s2 Group 12
Transition element
Cadmium Z =48 [Kr] 4s24p64d10 5s2 Group 12
Transition element
Mercury Z =80 [Xe] 4f14 5s25p65d10 6s2 Group 12
Transition element
Ytterbium Z = 70 [Xe] 4f14 6s1 4f block
Inner transition element
Lutetium Z = 71 [Xe] 4f14 6s2 5f block
Inner transition element
—————————————————————————-
However, as the copper and zinc families have a close resemblance to the transition elements, they are considered as transition elements. Ytterbium and nobelium are similar to other inner transition elements, and are considered inner transition elements.
On the basis of their chemical reactivity, the s2p6 elements are called group zero or noble elements (formerly called ‘the inert elements’) because of their extremely low reactivity. The remaining elements however, are called the R-1 to R-7 families as before.
The transition elements have incompletely filled d orbitals in their ground state or in chemically combined state. The configuration of the incompletely filled electronic subshells of these atoms is:
(n – 1)s2(n – 1)p6 (n – 1)dxns2 (x = 1-10)
Thus, atoms of transition elements have two outermost incompletely filled shells, with principal quantum numbers = n and n – 1. Therefore, their valence shells consist of electrons present in two outermost electron shells and these elements can use the (n – 1)d, ns and np electrons for bonding in chemical compounds.
Four series of transition elements are known. These correspond to the filling up of the energy levels corresponding to 3d, 4d, 5d, and 6d orbitals respectively:
———————————————————————————————-
Series Electronic configuration Elements (Atomic number Z)
——————————————————————————————
3d [Ar] 3d{1-10}4s1,2 Sc (21) – Zn (30)
4d [Kr] 4d{1-10}5s1,2 Y (39) – Cd (48)
5d [Xe] 4f14 5d{1-10}6s1,2 La (57), Hf (72) – Hg (80)
6d [Rn] 5f14 6d{1-10}7s1,2 Ac (89), Rf (104) – Og (118)
——————————————————————————————-
Strictly speaking, the atoms of lutetium (Z = 71) and nobelium (Z = 103) have completely filled f14 subshell and have electronic configuration similar to those of the transition elements:
Lutetium Z = 71 [Xe] 4f14 5d1 6s2 Completely filled 4f orbitals
Nobelium Z = 103 [Rn] 5f14 6d1 7s2 Completely filled 5f orbitals
Yet they are classified as inner transitions elements because of a close resemblance between the properties of these elements and the preceding inner transition elements.
All the transition elements have similar physico-chamical properties: high melting and boiling points, malleability and ductility, tensile strength, metallic character, formation of alloys, coordination compounds, high as well as low oxidation states, formation of paramagnetic and colored ions, polynuclear and metallic clustered compounds, etc. Detailed discussion is in Coordination Compound and Transition elements.
The inner transition elements correspond to the filling of electrons in the $f$ orbitals of the atoms.The electronic configuration of these elements can be represented as
(n – 2)s2 (n – 2)p6(n – 2)d10 (n – 2)f(1-14) (n – 1)s2
(n – 1)p6(n – 1)d1 ns2
The atoms of these elements have three outermost incompletely filled shells, with principal quantum numbers = n, n – 1 and n – 2.Their valence shells, therefore, consist of electrons in these three outermost shells.
Only two series of inner transition elements are known. These correspond to the filling up of the 4f and 5f orbitals, and contain fourteen elements each:
Series Common Name (Z)
———————————————————————————
4f Lanthanides or lanthanons Ce (58) to Lu (71)
5f Actinides or actinons Th (90) to Lr (103)
———————————————————————————
As the successive electrons in the lanthanide series are filled up in the low energy inner 4f subshell, they generally, do not participate in chemical combinations. As a result, the lanthanides have almost similar properties and show a regular gradation throughout the series.
In the 5f or the actinide series, however, due to larger atomic sizes and considerably lower energy differences between the 5f, 6d and 7s orbitals, the actinide elements up to Z = 96 can use their 5f as well as 6d electrons for chemical bonding. Actually speaking, thorium (90), protactinium (91) and uranium (92) resemble transition elements titanium, vanadium and chromium respectively. As Z increases, the energy of the lower shell 5f electrons decreases more as compared to that of higher shell 6d electrons, and the relative stability of 5f electrons increases. As a result, the latter 5f elements resemble the lanthanide elements of 4f series.
All the inner transition elements show a uniform valence state of III by losing outermost shell ns and next inner shell electrons. However, due to the additional stability of completely vacant f0, half-filled f7 and completely filled f14 configurations of the f subshell, the elements having one electron less or one electron more show additional states of II and IV respectively also.
Newlands (1864) was first to predict the existence of a missing element between silicon and tin with atomic mass of 73. (Presently, accepted value for atomic mass of germanium, discovered by Winkler in 1886, is 72.59.) Mendeleev’s predictions, made in 1869–1871, were more exhaustive and indicate the depth of his understanding. Of the 26 undiscovered elements of his time between hydrogen and uranium,
Eleven were lanthanides, which are very similar to one another, and were established in 1871 to 1907.
Five are noble gases (helium, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon) present in small amounts in air and isolated around 1894–1898 .
The four radioactive elements were discovered: polonium (Marie Curie, 1898), radium (M Curie and P Curie, 1898), actinium (A Debierne, 1899) and radon (Dorn, 1900).
A group of trans-uranium elements was synthesized by artificial nuclear reactions during 1940 onwards. The 6d transition series starts with Z = 104 (rutherfordium, Rf) and is complete at Z = 112 (copernicium Cn), Other members of the series are Z = 105 (dubnium, Db), Z = 106 (seaborgium, Sg), Z = 107 (Bohrium, Bh), Z = 108 (hassium, Hs), Z = 109 (meitnerium, Mt), Z = 110 (darmstadtium, Ds) and Z = 111 (roentgenium, Rg). These elements are increasing unstable with respect to α decay or spontaneous fission with half-life of the order of less than 1 sec. It is unlikely that much chemistry can be developed for these elements, though their physicochemical constants have all been predicted.
After this, there follow the six 7p elements for Z = 113 to 118. These are (with their atomic numbers): 113 (nohonium, Nh), 114 (flevonium, Fl), 115 (moscovium, Mc), 116 (livermanium, Lv), 117 (tenessium Ts) and 118 (oganesson, Og). On the basis of present theories of nuclear stability, the 298114Fl may be stable due to island of nuclear stability (number of protons = 114, a magic number for nuclear stability) with a long half-life.
Almost all the physical and chemical properties of an element depend upon the electronic configuration of its atom and the hold of nucleus on these electrons.
As example, consider a sodium atom having the electronic configuration of 1s22s22p63s1. Its properties depend upon the behavior of the outermost valence shell 3s1 electron. There are 2 + 8 = 10 electrons between the valence shell electron and the nucleus. According to electrostatics, the net effect of charge on these electrons will be that of a point charge carrying 10 units of negative charge placed at the centre. This should reduce the effect of positive charge at the nucleus by 10 units, so that the valence shell electrons should be attracted by a net positive charge of 1 unit only.
The decrease in the nuclear charge due to the presence of electrons in the inner shells is called the shielding effect or screening effect of electrons present in the inner shells. However, due to quantum mechanical considerations of penetration of orbitals and their orientations, all the inner electrons may not be equally effective in shielding the outer electrons (at some instant, they may be not be in line with nucleus and outer electron). For example, an electron in px orbital will not be much effective in shielding another electron in say py or pz orbital as they are mutually perpendicular to each other.
In multi-electron systems, the effective positive charge Z* experienced by the electrons is always less than the nuclear charge Z, and is given by J C Slater(1930) as
Z* = Z – σ
where σ is called Slater’s shielding constant or screening constant.
Based on the general behavior of electrons in polyelectronic systems, Slater (1930) gave the following empirical rules for calculating the screening constant (σ).
(1s)(2s, 2p) (3s, 3p) (3d), (4s, 4p) (4d, 4f) (5s, 5p), (5d, 5f) (6s, 6p), …
Numerical Example
For bromine, calculate the effective nuclear charge for (a) valence shell electrons, (b) 3d electrons, (c) 3p, and (d) 2p electrons.
Solution: The electrons in the orbitals of bromine are grouped as
(1s2) (2s2, 2p6) (3s2, 3p6), (3d10), (4s2, 4p5)
(a) For the valence shell electron of the 4s or 4p orbitals,
σ = 0.35 (electrons remaining in 4s and 4p orbitals = 6)
0.85 (electrons in 3d orbitals = 10) + 1.00 (electrons in
1s, 2s, 2p, 3s and 3p orbitals = 18)
= 0.35 × 6 + 0.85 × 10 + 1.00 × 18
= 28.60
Hence, Z* = Z – σ = 35.00 – 28.6 6.40
(b) For the 3d electrons,
σ = 0.35 (electrons remaining in 3d orbitals = 9) + 1.00 (electrons
in 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s and 3p orbitals = 18)
= 21.15
Hence, Z* = Z – σ = 35.00 – 21.15 = 13.85.
(c) For electron in the 3p orbitals,
σ = 0.35 (electrons remaining in 3s and 3p orbitals = 7)
+ 0.85 (electrons in 2s and 2p orbitals = 8)
+ 1.00 (electrons in 1s orbital = 2)
= 11.25
Hence, Z* = Z – σ = 35.00 – 11.25 = 23.75.
(d) For the 2p electrons,
σ = 0.35 (electrons remaining in 2s and 2p orbitals = 7)
+ 0.85 (electrons in 1s orbital = 2)
= 4.15
Hence, Z* = Z – σ = 35.00 – 4.15 = 30.85.
As seen from the above example, the effective nuclear charge increases as one goes nearer the nucleus.
Because of the incomplete shielding of the increasing nuclear charge by the incoming electrons, the effective nuclear charge for the valence shell electrons increases with atomic number across the period and is in the order:
Li(1.30) < Be(1.95) < B(2.60) < C(3.25) < N(3.90)
< O(4.55) < F(5.20) < Ne(5.85)
Sc(1.85) < Ti(2.00) < V(2.15) < Mn(2.45) < Fe(2.60)
< Co(2.75) < Ni(2.90) < Zn(3.20)
Note that the effective nuclear charge increases more rapidly for the representative elements (by 0.65 units) than for the transition elements (by 0.15 unit only) as the electrons in the latter are accommodated in the better shielding inner orbitals. Effective nuclear charge for chromium (1.75) and copper (2.50) is much lower than that expected in the series due to the exchange energy which transfers one outer 4s electron to inner 3d orbital.
1. Electrons in s and p orbitals as well as in d and f orbitals of a shell are considered to be affected to the same extent by the nuclear charge.
2. All the electrons in the s, p, d and f orbitals of a shell are considered to be equally effective in shielding electrons in higher orbitals. This is against the widely different energies and spatial orientations of these orbitals.
3. Penetration effects of orbitals are completely ignored.
4. These rules are approximate and do not give the actual energies of the orbitals in the atoms.
5. These rules are not much useful for elements with Z > 30.
Slater’s orbitals: Slater proposed that to obtain hydrogen-like orbitals for polyelectronic atoms,
(1) The nuclear charge should be replaced by Z*, calculated as above, and
(2) For n > 3, n is changed to n*, where n* = 3.7 for n = 4, 4.0 for n = 5, 4.32 for n = 6, and 4.5 for n =7.
The orbitals so calculated are called Slater’s orbitals, and were useful in calculating energies of different electrons in atoms.